Link Search Menu Expand Document

Course Outline

Lectures marked with * will be given in class. Other lectures will be made available online as videos at the beginning of the week; students shold watch them before attending the corresponding class.

Required readings should be completed before the corresponding class; they are designed to facilitate your understanding of the lectures or to help you with your group work. Additional materials are recommended but optional.

As we deal with the difficulties of online learning during a pandemic, the course outline is subject to change, but never in the direction of increased difficulty.

1. Climate Governance and Evidence-based Policy Research (16.3)

Overview
  • What is climate governance? Overview of historical and present issues in climate governance.
  • How do we study policy and governance? How can computational social science, data science, or approaches in complex systems help policy research?
Lectures
Chen, Introduction to the course.*
Ylä-Anttila, Why is climate change a social science problem?*
Required Readings
Hardin, G. 1968. “The tragedy of the commons.” Science 162(3859): 1243-1248.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., Stern., P.C. 2003. “The struggle to govern the commons.” Science 302(5652): 1907-1912.
Watts, D. 2017. “Should social science be more solution-oriented?” Nature Human Behaviour 1, 0015.
Additional Materials
Bernauer, T. 2013. “Climate Change Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 16, 421-448.
Zinnes, D.A. 1980. “Three puzzles in search of a researcher.” International Studies Quarterly 24(3): 315-342.

2. Computational Social Science and Climate Governance Research (18.3)

Overview
  • Overview of current computational social science studies in climate policy-related research.
  • Discussion of possible project topics.
Lectures
Chen, Social data science framework for studying climate governance.*
Required Readings
Lazer, D.M.J. et al. 2020. “Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities.” Science 369(6507): 1060-1062.
Gibert, K. 2018. “Environmental Data Science.” Environmental Modelling & Software 106, 4-12.
Additional Materials
Ilieva, R.T., McPhearson, T. 2018. “Social-media data for urban sustainability.” Nature Sustainability 1, 553-565.
Schmid-Petri, H. 2017. “Politicization of science: how climate change skeptics use experts and scientific evidence in their online communication.” Climatic Change 145, 523-537.
Treen, K.M.D. et al. 2020. “Online misinformation about climate change” WIREs: Climate Change 11(5): e665.
Ackerman, M.S. 2000. “The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human–Computer Interaction” Human-Computer Interaction 15(2-3): 179-203.

3. Approaches and Considerations in Working on Multidisciplinary Teams (23.3)

Overview
  • How to work in multidisciplinary teams? How can domain experts and technical specialists communicate with each other?
Lectures
Talayeh Aledavood, Lecturer, Aalto University, Guest lecture.*
Faqeeh, Considerations from a technical perspective.*
Ylä-Anttila, Considerations from a domain expert perspective.*
Chen, Panel discussion host.*
Required Readings
Keogh, E. 2009. “How to do good research, get it published in SIGKDD and get it cited!” (slides 16-19)
Additional Materials
Example videos illustrating good and bad collaboration (links to be provided)

Topics due by the end of 23.3

4. Contestations over rules and norms: Domestic institutions and policy actors (25.3)

Overview
  • Who works with whom to influence what policies when? With an emphasis on actors who work within formal institutional channels.
  • What is a useful framework for understanding policy-making? How do political survival considerations influence policy decisions?
  • How does this differ by domestic government institutions?
Lectures
Chen, Domestic institutions. (slides)
Ylä-Anttila, Collaborative policy networks.
Required Readings
Povitkina, M. 2018. “The limits of democracy in tackling climate change.” Environmental Politics 27(3): 411-432.
Imperial, M.T. et al. 2016. “Sustaining the useful life of network governance: Life cycles and developmental challenges.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14(3): 135-144.
Additional Materials
von Stein, J. 2020. “Democracy, Autocracy, and Everything in Between: How Domestic Institutions Affect Environmental Protection.” British Journal of Political Science, 1-19.
Li, Q., Reuveny, R. 2006. “Democracy and Environmental Degradation.” International Studies Quarterly 50(4): 935-956.
Dryzek, J.S., Niemeyer, S. 2019. “Deliberative democracy and climate governance.” Nature Human Behaviour 3, 411-413.

5. Scientific Communication (30.3)

Overview
  • How to write a research report? An academic paper? A policy brief?
  • How to present expert and technical information to a lay audience in a policy or research presentation?
Lectures
Chen, Scientific communication.*
Required Readings
Kueffer, C., Larson, B.M.H. 2014. “Responsible Use of Language in Scientific Writing and Science Communication.” BioScience 64(8): 719-724.
Additional Materials
Leong, P.A. 2014. “The passive voice in scientific writing. The current norm in science journals.” Journal of Scientific Communication 13(1), A03.

6. Contestations over rules and norms: Social movements and climate activism (8.4)

Overview
  • How do social movements and climate activists influence climate governance?
  • What are the ethical considerations when we apply data science to study human beings?
Lectures
Chen, Social movements and climate activism. (slides)
Chen, Ethical considerations in computational social science.*
Required Readings
Boulianne, S. et al. 2020. ““School Strike 4 Climate”: Social Media and the International Youth Protest on Climate Change” Media and Communication 8(2).
Metcalf, J., Crawford, K. 2016. “Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide.” Big Data & Society 3(1).
Additional Materials
Aalto University Guidelines on Ethics of Review and Data Protection Impact Assessment.

Interim reports due by the end of 9.4

7. International organizations and transnational governance (13.4)

Overview
  • What is the interplay between domestic politics and international regimes when it comes to setting climate policies?
  • How do norms spread around the world?
Lectures
Ylä-Anttila, International organizations and climate governance.
Chen, Networks of transnational actors.
Required Readings
Leifeld, P., Fisher, D. 2017. “Membership nominations in international scientific assessments.” Nature Climate Change 7, 730-735.
Vu, H.T. et al. 2020. “Who Leads the Conversation on Climate Change?: A Study of a Global Network of NGOs on Twitter.” Environmental Communication 14(4):450-464.
Additional Materials
Hale, T. 2020. “Transnational actors and transnational governance in global environmental politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 23, 203-220.
Vu, H.T. et al. 2021. “Social Media and Environmental Activism: Framing Climate Change on Facebook by Global NGOs.” Science Communication 43(1):91-115.
Fünfgeld, H. 2015. “Facilitating local climate change adaptation through transnational municipal networks” Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability 12, 67-73.

8. Addressing the social consequences of climate change (15.4)

Overview
  • How have changes to the environment affected social systems?
  • To what extent are there inequalities associated with climate-induced social issues? What kinds of policies are aimed at addressing these issues and are they effective?
Lectures
Talayeh Aledavood, Guest lecture: Studying outcomes to climate disasters using social media data.*
Chen, Climate justice and climate-induced inequalities.
Required Readings
Hazlett, C., Mildenberger, M. 2020. “Wildfire Exposure Increases Pro-Environment Voting within Democratic but Not Republican Areas.” American Political Science Review 114(4): 1359-1365.
Wang, Z. et al. 2019. “Are vulnerable communities digitally left behind in social responses to natural disasters? An evidence from Hurricane Sandy with Twitter data.” Applied Geography 108, 1-8.
Additional Materials
Mah, A. 2017. “Environmental justice in the age of big data: challenging toxic blind spots of voice, speed, and expertise.” Environmental Sociology 3(2): 122–133.

9. Presentations (20.4, 22.4)

Overview
  • 15 minute presentations per group, with an additional 5 minute question/feedback period

No more class sessions after 22.4.

Final reports due by the end of 21.5 Peer evaluations due by the end of 21.5